[HOT] Difficulty in communicating with iD users

[Dale Kunce]

I'm totally against HOT maintaining a fork of ID. It sounds simple enough
in the beginning but will be more difficult as time goes on.

Updating training materials is a pretty simple thing to do as we should try
and refresh them regularly anyway.
On Mar 6, 2016 10:55 PM, "Mikel Maron" <mikel.maron at gmail.com> wrote:

> People, get a grip.
>
> There are a lot of cool ideas that have risen and re-risen in this thread.
> Custom iD presets for HOT tasks, tighter coordination between training
> guides and software release cycles, better management of tags across OSM.
>
> HOT excels in emergencies, but this isn't one. The label "unclassified
> road" has changed to "minor road". This is a good thing (
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2916) and something we can
> easily get our minds around.
>
> -Mikel
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160307/bd51bae7/attachment.html>