[HOT] Difficulty in communicating with iD users

[Tyler Radford]

A short while back, Thomas Tolloschek, a HOT community member (copied),
provided a demo of a simple UI that he built which helps to automatically
generate custom presets for iD without manually editing preset files.

Tasking Manager project managers could use the tool to setup streamlined iD
presets for their projects.

This could be a great opportunity to move forward on the idea within the
technical working group.

Best
Tyler

*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
email: tyler.radford at hotosm.org
U.S. mobile: +1 617.285.2009

*Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team*
*Using OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Response & Economic Development*
web <http://hotosm.org/> | twitter <https://twitter.com/hotosm> | facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/hotosm> | donate <http://hotosm.org/donate>

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Russell Deffner <russell.deffner at hotosm.org>
wrote:

> Thanks Bryan, I thought you probably were on this mailing list, just
> wanted to try to direct people who want to get involved with iD to know
> where to go – sounds like github is the place :)
>
>
>
> This is more what I was thinking is actually possible is to just have a
> ‘stripped-down’ version of iD ‘embedded’ into the Tasking Manager – and for
> those who want to get involved with Tasking Manager stuff, the HOT Tech
> Working Group is the place for that:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/Working_groups#Technical
>
>
>
> =Russ
>
>
>
> *From:* Bryan Housel [mailto:bryan at 7thposition.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 07, 2016 7:44 AM
> *To:* Dale Kunce
> *Cc:* Mikel Maron; hot at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [HOT] Difficulty in communicating with iD users
>
>
>
> I agree, you don’t want to maintain an iD fork..
>
>
>
> But it’s probably helpful to think of the “presets" as a plugin.  HOT TM
> can embed the same iD software that OSM and everyone else uses, but with a
> smaller subset of presets that apply more to the work that HOT does.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:45 AM, Dale Kunce <dale.kunce at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm totally against HOT maintaining a fork of ID. It sounds simple enough
> in the beginning but will be more difficult as time goes on.
>
> Updating training materials is a pretty simple thing to do as we should
> try and refresh them regularly anyway.
>
> On Mar 6, 2016 10:55 PM, "Mikel Maron" <mikel.maron at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> People, get a grip.
>
>
>
> There are a lot of cool ideas that have risen and re-risen in this thread.
> Custom iD presets for HOT tasks, tighter coordination between training
> guides and software release cycles, better management of tags across OSM.
>
>
>
> HOT excels in emergencies, but this isn't one. The label "unclassified
> road" has changed to "minor road". This is a good thing (
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2916) and something we can
> easily get our minds around.
>
>
>
> -Mikel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160307/2f9ad7a6/attachment.html>