[HOT] Moving the focus to JOSM in mapathons
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Sat May 14 13:39:16 UTC 2016
I think if we suggest they download Java before arriving, josm-tested.jar
can be copied for a USB stick or local server ie laptop. I think that
would save bandwidth and trying to download multiple copies at the same
time would mean delays.
Hopefully it works out.
On 14 May 2016 at 07:11, Pete Masters <pedrito1414 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, over the past few weeks, some of the validation chat has focused
> on tools (iD / JOSM, generally). We made a decision at this month's London
> Missing Maps mapathon to try and put more of a focus on using JOSM, rather
> than iD. We're not sure how it went yet, but will continue to try and
> develop this in future months.
> I have written a quick OSM diary on it, here:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pedrito1414/diary/38604 If you have
> comments, please feel free to leave them there. I am also going to share it
> with new mappers who were involved as they are generally not on this list
> and their thoughts could be interesting...
> *Pete Masters*
> Missing Maps Project Coordinator
> +44 7921 781 518
> missingmaps.org <http://www.missingmaps.org/>
> *@pedrito1414* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
> *@theMissingMaps* <https://twitter.com/TheMissingMaps>
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT