[HOT] User removing highway tags from the Earthquake area (Uganda and Tanzania)
Michael Heißmeier
michael63 at digital-filestore.de
Tue Sep 13 11:36:20 UTC 2016
Hi all,
the preliminary fix is committed (changeset 42123103). Took a while because I
decided to have a look at those ways first. This proved to be a good decision: a
couple of them were no highways but round huts without any tags...
Feel free to retag the highway network west of Bukoba.
Best Regards
Michael
Marco, 2016-09-13 13:25:
> Go for it. I think that acting quick is essential.
> Thank you both guys for your super fast answers.
>
> Cheers
> Marco
>
> On September 13, 2016 1:14:30 PM GMT+02:00, "Michael Heißmeier"
> <michael63 at digital-filestore.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> unless someone stops me within the next minutes I would assign
> "highway=road" to untagged ways now. Fixing the tagging will certainly
> take a while and I have other obligations today as well so others are
> invited to jump in then.
>
> Best Regards
> Michael
>
> Blake Girardot, 2016-09-13 13:07:
>> Hi Marco, Hi Michael,
>>
>> Marco, thank you very much for catching this and posting to the list Marco!
>>
>> Michael, I would go for option 2
>>
>> I have also sent an email to the mapper who made the mistake. Mistakes
>> happen, it is just the nature of things.
>>
>> If someone wants to fix them up via option 2 above, please let us
>> know. It will take me at least an hour before I can dig in and fix it
>> myself, but I will let the list know when I do if no one has started
>> before then.
>>
>> Thank you again!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Blake
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Michael Heißmeier
>> <michael63 at digital-filestore.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would assume that this is some kind of weird error. Looking at the user's
>>> history this obviously only happened in three changesets, 42110663, 42112337
>>> and 42112459. His latest one and the immediate previous ones do not show
>>> this kind of modification.
>>>
>>> Considering that this is an area with an activation going I am not sure
>>> whether a standard revert of the changesets will be a good idea - I assume
>>> that many of these objects have been touched in the meantime.
>>>
>>> I see two options:
>>>
>>> 1. Revert the changesets and thus lose all other edits by the user from
>>> these changesets too. I tried locally with changeset 42112459 which would
>>> result in 16 conflicts to be solved. The main problem would be with nodes
>>> modified in these changesets and subsequently by other users.
>>>
>>> 2. Only detect ways without tags which is easy with JOSM's validator and
>>> assign "highway=road" to them to mark them for further inspection. This
>>> would require going over the whole area afterwards and re-assign proper
>>> highway tags.
>>>
>>> I am not sure which one sounds easier. Option 2 is quicker for the immediate
>>> fix but means a lot of work afterwards.
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> Marco, 2016-09-13 12:01:
>>>
>>> I just came thru this area [1] that I tried to map in the last few days
>>> and found out that someone has been removing the highway=* tag from a
>>> large number of ways. I wrote him a private message asking for the
>>> reason of his edits, but I'd like to share this problem with someone
>>> with more HOT experience in order to understand what's going on and how
>>> can we quickly fix this, as road mapping seems to me seriously important
>>> for the guys on the ground who use OSM to help the locals
>>>
>>> [1]http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-1.2260/31.5053&layers=HD
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael
>>> (osm:michael63)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>
>
> --
> /Michael
> (osm:michael63) /
>
--
/Michael
(osm:michael63) /
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20160913/61e0964d/attachment.html>
More information about the HOT
mailing list