[HOT] Progression, Re: Mapping buildings with new mappers at a maperthon
Bjoern Hassler
bjohas+mw at gmail.com
Sat Nov 18 08:38:14 UTC 2017
Dear friends,
Not in direct response to John, but on a tangent.
Do people who organise mapathons have a sense of how many people come again
vs. those who only come once? Do you have specific strategies to encourage
people to come back?
Do you have a plan for progression moving people onto JOSM, or as John
suggests starting some/all on JOSM? Then moving people to validation?
Would be interested to hear!
Bjoern
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 at 00:20, john whelan <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not a great person for maperthons, the last one I attended could have
> gone a little smoother, there was a time delay before mapping. They were
> mapping buildings and highways and although they were mapping for some time
> no tiles were completed.
>
> Recently there was another one locally which I drifted down to and I did
> the patter. I took two laptops with JOSM preinstalled and set them up.
>
> As new mappers came in I just asked them to sit down at the laptops and
> start mapping with the building tool. Then we set up their laptops with
> JOSM and they continued on their own machines installing JOSM, I think one
> needed to download JAVA and I had JOSM an a DVD. They then continued
> mapping. We had them mapping their first building within minutes. The big
> delay was setting up an OSM account and logging into the task manager.
>
> 12-15 people registered we had six mappers eventually, four were new to
> JOSM. They mapped buildings quite quickly and I guarantee all were square,
> all were correctly tagged and none were more than six inches out of place.
> Most were spot on in Bing. Tiles were completed and not just ones without
> buildings in them we deliberately pointed them to tiles that had a fair
> number of buildings in them.
>
> As they mapped they became more adventurous in drawing two squares on an L
> shaped building and joining them together. We knew that one section was a
> caravan park so the mapper explored the tags and found
> building=static_caravan and was delighted to find they could select all the
> static_caravans and retag them all at once.
>
> One new mapper was a teacher so since we had a very experienced iD mapper
> there after she had been mapping in JOSM for a period of time I got him to
> show her how to map in iD. Her comment was not so complex to set up in
> that you didn't need to start JOSM first but per building it was more mouse
> clicks involved and more to remember.
>
> I don't know if the group of mappers we had was small enough we could give
> them a bit more one on one or they were just exceptionally good new
> mappers. They all had Windows machines to work on.
>
> I do know that Jo has had some similar results going directly to JOSM for
> new mappers.
>
> It does look as if going JOSM and the building_tool plugin is a viable
> route for new mappers mapping buildings in maperthons. Both the quantity
> per mapper and the data quality of the mapped buildings was high.
>
> Cheerio John
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20171118/52bbda83/attachment.html>
More information about the HOT
mailing list