[Imports-us] A proposal for handling the tiger realignment

alex at mapbox.com alex at mapbox.com
Fri Aug 9 17:42:56 UTC 2013


> since there is no information then about how those two relate.

Can you expand on this?


http://twitter.com/lxbarth

On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Eric Fischer <enf at pobox.com> wrote:

> It doesn't move any nodes that anyone else has moved. The tricky part is the edges where one point has been moved and TIGER wants to move an adjacent point, since there is no information then about how those two relate.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On Aug 9, 2013 10:22 AM, "Alex Barth" <alex at mapbox.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What that means is that we can create a metric of OSM activity in an
>>> area, and by doing that, decide whether or not the area should have an
>>> automated import process, or a manual review process.
>> 
>> Ccorrect me if I'm wrong (eric fischer) - isn't that what the automated script inherently does by only touching nodes that haven't been touched by contributors?
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Imports-us mailing list
>> Imports-us at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports-us/attachments/20130809/7f0dfdd5/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports-us mailing list