[Imports-us] Montgomery County MD Unauthorized (?) Import

[Elliott Plack]

Alright, I left a comment on one of the changesets. Looking more at the
data it is very unlikely it is actually traced, at least from bing. The
node count is high, and there are new developments that don't have bing
coverage but are in the GIS data. If they were surveyed, you'd think there
would be at least one address :)

We'll see.


On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:01 PM Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 11/19/2015 06:21 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> > The comments include "traces" but the data matched MoCo shapefiles I've
> > looked at, and there are houses in the "trace" where there are none in
> > reality (they were razed, but the data is old). Would the DWG typically
> > notice and investigate such a thing?
>
> They noticed it now ;)
>
> It sure looks like a candidate for an outright revert, but could you
> perhaps try and have a word with the user first and ascertain whether
> these are really plain imports or maybe there's some manual work her
> worthy of saving (the import look stretched over several weeks that's
> why I wonder).
>
> Also some older changesets carry the comment "roads and buildings" and
> maybe they should be kept.
>
> If you can sort that out then DWG is happy to run the revert. If they
> don't cooperate, we can still revert but of course it would be ideal if
> they acknowledged their mistake and perhaps even helped with the new
> import?
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports-us mailing list
> Imports-us at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
>
-- 
Elliott Plack
http://elliottplack.me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports-us/attachments/20151119/e44e05e0/attachment.html>