[Imports] Importing Arkansas data
Mike Dupont
jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com
Mon Mar 21 22:11:36 UTC 2011
On the subject of arkansas, I was working on the norfork lake and the gov
hydrology data would be well worth importing....
http://www.mail-archive.com/imports@openstreetmap.org/msg00380.html
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361097
http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/ds240/polygon/g36092.zip
mike
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Pieren <pieren3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> To clarify what I meant about parcel data: I'm assuming you mean parcels
>> in terms of household property boundaries. This data is difficult to fit
>> into the OSM data model because it a) updates frequently and b) has an
>> "official" source that is better to use than OSM. If you can extract
>> addressing from the parcel data then we can use it to do better geocoding,
>> but loading OSM with parcel data puts us closer to a "data dumping grounds"
>> than an active, community-built map.
>>
>>
> For information, in France (65 M inhabitants), we have all the tools to
> import parcels for about 2 thirds of the territory but we all agreed to not
> do this for the same reasons as listed above.
>
> Pieren
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
>
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20110321/2810b931/attachment.html>
More information about the Imports
mailing list