[Imports] Joining/merging address attributes to existing footprints
joe at joelarson.com
joe at joelarson.com
Tue Apr 24 19:37:29 UTC 2012
Steve, Josh and Thomas - sincere appreciation for your thoughts,
comments, advice! I want to respond and fill-in any missing information
from my original post.
The data is from mixed sources and methods; GPS field
observation/survey and an analysis/workflow where select parcel
attributes were centroided then edited, moved to be on top of the
primary building on that parcel. Field validation has been conducted for
points which were not originally collected from GPS field survey. This
is a large effort of multiple agencies - where my office is the primary
lead, managing the process. The data is public domain licensed.
My plan is to use already utilized methods to transfer attributes, such
as a spatial join e.g.
http://maps.cga.harvard.edu/qgis/wkshop/join_spatial.php - manual
inspection is not my primary plan with this project. From my experience
so far, I understand the discouragement of imports - I also recognize
the high priority respect to pre-existing data holds and we will be very
cautious of historic user contributions during this process.
Josh - thank you for reminding me about the Conflation plugin for JOSM.
I've been down the whole OpenJump, RoadMatcher conflation effort when
our County purchased contractor delivered street-centerlines (also
public domain) - never followed through on that project/effort but I
have great optimism about the JOSM Conflation effort. I will get
accustomed to the plugin-workflow and give feedback, as well as follow
your developments...are you funded or take donations at all for your
work on this?
Thomas - I am still going through the documentation and doing tests
with the ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap. The only tag that is in the
existing building-footprints I'm attempting to conflate information/tags
to is `building=yes`. Something I'm kinda stuck on is: how can I use the
Attribute Selector to create stand-alone attributes for the tags I
previously proposed such as addr:street:prefix or addr:housenumber:unit
? (BTW, I noticed a typo in my original post where I wrote `UNIT ->
addr:street:suffix` meant to say `UNIT -> addr:housenumber:unit` ...
tags which I was looking to hear feedback on.) I may want to address
this on http://esriosmeditor.codeplex.com/discussions however, instead
of boring others with particulars...
Thank you again all _ joe
More information about the Imports
mailing list