[Imports] [Talk-us] shawnee county landuse

[Martin Koppenhöfer]

Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike  Dupont <jamesmikedupont at googlemail.com>:

> 3.       What tagging are you proposing?
> 
> addr:* and landuse
> the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags
> eg 
> lbcs:activity:code    {1100=1}
> lbcs:activity:name    {Household activities=1}
> lbcs:function:code    {1170=1}
> lbcs:function:name    {Garden apartment complex (1=1}
> 
> These codes are details on how the lot is zoned. otherwise I am using this information for fixing the street names and zip codes. 


Are the landuses you plan to tag actual landuses or permitted/planned landuses?

> 4.       The last few times someone has proposed importing property lot data the consensus has been that that type of data shouldn’t be imported into OSM. Why is this different?
> 
> I am importing the plots for zipcode, house number and address data. It is being used to tag the buildings, it can be deleted when it has been totally processed.


IMHO addresses belong (often) to plots, so in these cases there is no point in transferring the address information to a building. Don't remember consensus to not import property limits. I do remember though that there were concerns about the sheer amount of data increase if we imported this for the whole world.

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20121216/5fd74943/attachment.html>