[Imports] Hungarian CLC import

Paul Norman penorman at mac.com
Sat Nov 3 19:36:57 GMT 2012


Is it possible to use a source key that makes it clear that it’s CLC?

 

Are the values for CLC:code and CLC:id listed on the wiki?

 

If CLC:code indicates the landuse type, is there any value to it if it is
duplicating the tagging?

 

From: Balázs Szalkai [mailto:bszalkai0 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 7:45 AM
To: Martin Koppenhoefer; imports at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Imports] Hungarian CLC import

 

Hi,

Here are the properties of an example multipolygon:

 

<tag k="CLC:code" v="311"/>

<tag k="CLC:id" v="HU-18010"/>

<tag k="CLC:year" v="2006"/>

<tag k="landuse" v="forest"/>

<tag k="source" v="© EEA, Koppenhága (2009); Készítette a FÖMI a KvVM
megbízásából (2009)"/>

<tag k="wood" v="deciduous"/>

<tag k="type" v="multipolygon"/>

 

"You will also see that people are adjusting their own work to what is
already there (because that's the "standard")"

 

Well, I'm not sure. My humble experience shows that there are very thorough
mappers who e.g. always add a "source" tag to their additions (even if it is
a survey) and try to be as precise as possible, and there are people who
flood OpenStreetMap with rivers, places, etc. that are about 70m off from
reality; or they make frequent spelling mistakes (I have corrected lots of
them). Your standards really do not depend on what other people do and how.
But this is just my theory.

 

"you will be surprised how fast this situation might change"

 

Let's hope the best. A more recent and more detailed Bing would really be
awesome. In the past few months I recorded several tracks with my GPS at a
poorly photographed area, but that was quite a tedious work compared to
finding and tracing them on a satellite imagery.

 

"Well, if there are no objections from the mappers in your area"

 

no, there aren't.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20121103/2dbbf324/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list