[Imports] TIGER realignment import

Eric Fischer enf at pobox.com
Tue Aug 6 16:23:42 UTC 2013

Oh, that is very unfortunate. I intentionally let it realign untouched
segments of ways that have been touched in other segments because there are
a lot of roads that have had one endpoint on a major road fixed but the
rest left misaligned, but that policy doesn't help in this case. Maybe the
policy should be that a single old TIGER point left between two edited
points should never be moved?


On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Guertin <andrew.guertin at uvm.edu>wrote:

> I checked out my area of Chittenden County, Vermont.
> There were a number of places where someone (some but not all of them
> me) had gone through and manually aligned a road using satellite
> imagery, and had left a point untouched because it was in the right
> place--and this osc moves the point to a slightly wrong spot.
> In fact, excepting one small area that apparently no one had touched,
> *all* of the road changes were on roads that had already been manually
> aligned. Usually this was just one or two points on a road, though one
> road had 4.
> Is there any way to filter out these types of changes?
> --Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20130806/9a61c87f/attachment.html>

More information about the Imports mailing list