[Imports] TIGER realignment import

[Paul Norman]

> From: Eric Fischer [mailto:enf at pobox.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:22 PM
> To: Bryce Nesbitt
> Cc: imports
> Subject: Re: [Imports] TIGER realignment import
> 
> I don't quite understand what is going on here because the node that you 
> have numbered -1708 is -314 in my file (06013-0000.osc) It is included 
> because Norine Drive (way 7864991) was reshaped in the new TIGER. 

JOSM negative numbers differ from negative numbers in the XML. 
Specifically, when a file is opened negatively numbered IDs are assigned 
a new negative ID that does not collide with any existing negative IDs 
in what JOSM has open. 

> In 16045-0000.osc, node 129052498 would have been included because one 
> of the ways that contains it was relocated in new TIGER, but I didn't 
> include the way in the .osc because it didn't have any nodes added or 
> removed, just relocated. I can add the ways to the output even when they 
> aren't necessary if it makes things clearer. 

Don't do that, that would be wrong. There are ways to load the 
appropriate data in JOSM, which I'll type up tonight if I have time.