[Imports] Vermont Town boundaries from VCGI

Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net
Mon Dec 2 19:22:30 UTC 2013


On 12/2/13 2:13 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
>> From: Andrew Guertin [mailto:andrew.guertin at uvm.edu]
>> Subject: Re: [Imports] Vermont Town boundaries from VCGI
>>
>> I currently have boundary=administrative on the relations representing
>> each town, and nothing on the member ways. There doesn't seem to be
>> complete consensus on whether member ways should also be marked
>> boundary=administrative, with it being inconsistently applied in the
>> areas of neighboring states I checked. I decided to not duplicate the
>> information.
> The rule is to have boundary=administrative on the member ways with the
> numerically lowest admin_level of any of its relations.
>
ok i can go with that. but most of what i'm seeing does the opposite, i'm
seeing lots of admin_level=8 tags on ways that are part of higher level
boundaries.

richard


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 946 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20131202/870cbe85/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Imports mailing list