[Imports] Add to discard ist : more tiger tags
bryce2 at obviously.com
Thu Sep 12 19:17:39 UTC 2013
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > tiger:name_1
> The tiger name_#, name_base, name_direction, prefix, suffix tags are
> still useful.
> Ideally, all TIGER names would be folded into more meaningful tags
> (name, alt_name, etc.) but until then, we want to keep the names in
> the object.
Do you have examples of tiger based imports were the folding was not done?
If there were tiger imports done without folding, the editors could delete
the tags if folded.
The tiger:zip_left_XXX series however... does not have a purpose I can
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports