[Imports] Fwd: Sardinia Regional Dataset Building Import: second proposal

[Leonardo Frassetto]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leonardo Frassetto <kinetocore86 at gmail.com>
Date: 2014-04-03 14:59 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: [Imports] Sardinia Regional Dataset Building Import: second
proposal
To: Florian Fanselow <flofan at gfz-potsdam.de>


Hi Florian,

thanks for you answer. I think you're right, i'll add that tags to the one
you suggested. I was a bit doubtful about the use of building:use but i see
on taginfo that is well received (>400000 worldwide). Thanks!

Leonardo


2014-04-03 14:53 GMT+02:00 Florian Fanselow <flofan at gfz-potsdam.de>:

Hi Leonardo,
>
> thanks for answering my questions! But now there are still some more^^
>
> Do you use the Tagging-Tables, which are documented on
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sardegna/Import/Edificato , for the
> import? If you do this, will there be any problems by adding an extra tag
> 'building:use=' ?
> So you can specify the official descriptions?
> I don't know if I guess right, but  IMHO the descriptions "edificio della
> provincia" [0115], "edificio della regione" [0116] and "muncipio" [0113]
> could be specified with the tag 'building:use=government'. Furthermore I
> would add for all churches/chapels the tag 'building:use=religious' and for
> schools and kindergartens 'building:use=education'.
>
> Some more suggestions are:
>
> stazione di polizia [0106] --> building=yes , amenity=police ,
> building:use=civic
>
> stazione pompieri [0108] --> building=yes , amenity=fire_station ,
> building:use=civic
>
> edificio ospedaliero [0118] --> building=yes , amenity=hospital ,
> building:use=medical
>
> edificio postale [0119] --> building=yes , amenity=post_office ,
> building:use=service
>
> tribunale [0123] --> building=yes , amenity=courthouse , building:use=civic
>
> I would use the simple 'building=yes', because in my opinion the key
> 'building' should describe the type of the building and with 'building:use'
> you can describe the use of a building.
>
> For gradinata del campo sportivo [02] in table 'Classe: 02 - MANUFATTI DI
> IMPIANTI SPORTIVI (ST 02 TE 02 CL 02)' I would add additionally to the tag
> 'building=yes' the tag 'building:use=sport'.
>
> If you want I can insert these suggestions on the wiki-page to discuss
> them there.
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
>
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:50:42 +0200
>  Leonardo <kinetocore86 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Florian!
> >
> > Thanks for all you advices but the data about the type
> >of building is not present on that file. I'm sure that it
> >exist on the Sardinian government office but they decided
> >to not release it yet. If one day it wil be released we
> >will add that information on the existing data. :)
> >
> > About the kindergarden i'm based on what is described
> >here:
> >
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dschool
> >
> > The building itself it's a school but the area will be
> >tagged as amenity=kindergarten + isced:level=0.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Leonardo
> >
> > Il 31/03/2014 10:15, Florian Fanselow ha scritto:
> >> Hello Leonardo,
> >>
> >> I've read your proposal of the building import in
> >>sardinia at the imports-mailing-list. That looks very
> >>well, even if I don't speak italian  ;-)
> >> I'm especially interested in the part of
> >>'how-to-translate-the-descriptions-into-the-tagging-scheme',
> >>because I worked on this for the big data-import of
> >>cologne
> >>
> >>  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cologne/Adressimport
> >>
> >> In this tagging-table
> >>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cologne/Adressimport/Nutzung
> >>you can see, how we translated the (unfortunately german)
> >>descriptions into the OSM-Tagging-Scheme. As you may see,
> >>we have added the tag 'building:use' for nearly all of
> >>the different buildings, so that the buildings are more
> >>detailed. Maybe this is a tag you can add to your import?
> >> I you want, I could do it for you!
> >>
> >> Further I have a question about the proposed tags of
> >>'asilo'. I don't know the italian
> >>school/kindergarten-system, so I wonder a little bit, why
> >>you used the tag 'building=school' for an building that
> >>belongs to a kindergarten. In my opinion it would be
> >>better if you used 'building=yes' +
> >>'amenity=kindergarten'. But that's just my german view.
> >>Please correct me, if I have to edit my opinion ;-)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Florian
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20140403/7cc3f85f/attachment.html>