[Imports] [Imports-us] Completion of King County Address Import

Johan C osmned at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 22:19:43 UTC 2014


> But if you have the buildings, I think the consensus has been to merge them
in.

Not quite. Consensus has been that there are two options, and that local
communities (not individuals) can decide on the preferred option


2014/1/12 Jason Remillard <remillard.jason at gmail.com>

> Hi Clifford,
>
> > Building outlines will not be included this time. The original Seattle
> > Import merged address nodes with the building outlines. When the
> building is
> > torn down mappers are removing the outline and but not saving the address
> > information. Often this address information is reused. Without tools to
> > retain the address node, we feel that it is better to not merge the
> outline
> > with an address.
>
> It seems like an overreaction over a simple mapping mistake? If you
> don't have the buildings, then importing addressees as points is fine.
> But if you have the buildings, I think the consensus has been to merge
> them in.
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20140112/b6eaea01/attachment.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list