[Imports] [Imports-us] Completion of King County Address Import
osmned at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 23:09:03 UTC 2014
I'm aware that there are several people on this list very much in favour of
merging address nodes to building outlines. There has been a long
discussion in October '...to merge or not to merge' on this list. I can't
distill any other conclusion from that discussion other than that there was
no consensus on merging or not merging. And maybe that's logical, because
it's not a black and white discussion.
2014/1/12 Serge Wroclawski <emacsen at gmail.com>
> Please do not cross post.
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Johan C <osmned at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> But if you have the buildings, I think the consensus has been to merge
> >> them in.
> > Not quite. Consensus has been that there are two options, and that local
> > communities (not individuals) can decide on the preferred option
> Actually, the Import Guidelines require that any import go through
> consensus on the imports list, and we generally do want to keep things
> consistent. I think there are arguments on both sides of this issue to
> be heard, but in this case, community refers to the OSM community as a
> - Serge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports