[Imports] cleanup broken import "fix"

[Eric Ladner]

Yes, the jagged edge on the national forest matches closely the lines on
the USGS topo maps, so it's believable.

The tagging is decent enough, but probably shouldn't have the
landuse=forest.


On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:32 AM, SomeoneElse <lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk>
wrote:

> malenki wrote:
>
>>
>> I am done; due to some conflicts (a user surveyed some TIGER and other
>> data meanwhile) and timeouts there are three changesets:
>> http://www.osm.org/changeset/22917492
>> http://www.osm.org/changeset/22920297
>> http://www.osm.org/changeset/22921689
>>
>>
> Thanks for that.
>
> Also, there's some excellent "dogtooth forest" east of SLO too:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/35.3763/-120.3810
>
> (I could believe that the official "national forest" has such jagged
> edges.  The landuse=forest area?  Unlikely)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>



-- 
Eric Ladner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20140617/e9ba82d1/attachment.html>