[Imports] CLC meadow cleanup

Christoph Hormann chris_hormann at gmx.de
Wed Mar 26 16:02:54 UTC 2014


On Wednesday 26 March 2014, Sylvain Maillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think that Pieren was complaining about someone or because
> the first example were in France, it's more about the way to do it :
> on the french list we get complains about polygon deletion, people
> already call it vandalism as there was no related message on the
> french list ...

I cannot say this for landuse=meadow since i have not looked at these 
but for natural=rock and natural=scrub the thing is this data is 
usually just pointless even if there have been local attempts to 
improve it, simply because the premise of the CLC data that there is an 
area with more or less homogeneous properties is not fulfilled.  In 
such cases any attempt to move the boundaries of such a polygon to a 
more accurate position is doomed.

In defence of the CLC data - there are similar cases elsewhere based on 
manual mapping which are equally questionable.  For example around here 
there is frequent use of landuse=grass like

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1576515

It would be equally right to delete those IMO although i am pretty sure 
this would be considered vandalism by some.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/



More information about the Imports mailing list