[Imports] Address import for Biella

[Rafael Avila Coya]

Hi Andrea (and Pieren):

I agree with the fact that you loose information when ignoring those
addresses. It's quite clear, and sorry not to have mentioned it on my
previous email.

What I tried to say is that it seemed to me that those address nodes
(for example 4a to 4t) seemed to belong to the 4 building. The fact that
they were stretching so far made me think they belonged to the same
building, and that they were entrances inside it, so it would be wrong
to import them that way.

But with your clarification of belonging to each of the garages, it
makes more sense for me now. Thanks for the aclaration.

Cheers,

Rafael.

On 21/11/14 14:11, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     2014-11-21 16:22 GMT+01:00 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan at gmail.com
>     <mailto:musuruan at gmail.com>>:
> 
>         I think it is plain wrong to delete subordinates. 
> 
> 
> 
>     +1, but I think Rafael has a point by spotting this particular place
>     in the data, it looks a bit fishy, the best solution would be to
>     have a survey on that spot to see what is really there - and where.
> 
> 
> I can already tell you what's there - a raw of garages each one with an
> address.
> 
> BR,
> 
> Andrea
>  

-- 
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ravilacoya

--------------------------------

Por favor, non me envíe documentos con extensións .doc, .docx, .xls,
.xlsx, .ppt, .pptx, aínda podendoo facer,  non os abro.

Atendendo á lexislación vixente, empregue formatos estándares e abertos.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument#Tipos_de_ficheros