[Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosion sites
bryce2 at obviously.com
Tue Apr 14 21:29:11 UTC 2015
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com
> I agree that this tag is on the borderline, but I plea to keep it for the
> reasons I mentioned before, I think they are an interesting piece in the
> map that is a significant part in the whole picture
I think they're interesting also.
But I think they'll be more visible, useful and appropriate as an overlap
There's no particular integration with the OSM base layer.
I doubt most of these sites can be surveyed: neither the underground ones
nor the air blasts. The radiation plume
is too dispersed in the case of air blasts. And what's next, mapping the
extent of those? Mapping places where
famous people talked about nuclear blasts? Mapping former sites of nuclear
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports