[Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosion sites
frederik at remote.org
Wed Apr 15 21:18:04 UTC 2015
On 04/15/2015 04:09 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> It does not cause any problems to keep this data, and it is
> very small data set. Just keep it.
1. If it were true that the data does not cause problems, that would
still not be a sufficient reason to keep it in OSM.
2. I believe that it *does* cause problems because it indicates to
others that OSM is a suitable place for such data (which OSM is not).
There is a very real danger of people wanting to map past natural
disasters or even past cultural events, "because we also map nuclear
These sites are a bad example and if the import had been properly
discussed along the rules we have today, it would certainly have been
Hence my desire to remove them.
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the Imports