[Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosion sites
osm at terbrueggen.net
Fri Apr 17 12:07:35 UTC 2015
>> I think this illustrates the point that it's very easy to add
>> questionable or low quality data to OSM,
>> and very hard to gain consensus to remove it.
I don't see the point. Why is the data questionable or of low quality?
The data is of high quality and maybe one quarter (wild guess) of the
explosions left no trace on earth.
Please simply take a look at Nevada Test Site in JOSM with Bing imagery
and tell me, why this doesn't belong into OSM.
Technical data about yield and so on might be removed, I don't care.
More information about the Imports