[Imports] Uganda Bureau of Statistics educational facilities import

Rafael Avila Coya ravilacoya at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 00:22:33 UTC 2015


Yes. I can delete those tags from the changeset tags. They don't make sense.

Thank you,

Rafael.

On 29/12/15 21:00, Jo wrote:
> For information that you want to show to the importer, but don't  want
> to risk uploading, you could abuse one of the following tags:
> 
> created_by
> odbl
> 
> and a few other tags that get discarded before the upload takes place,
> at least when using JOSM. I feel we should have a few dedicated tags for
> that purpose, but that is something to solve at the editor level.
> 
> Polyglot
> 
> 2015-12-29 20:53 GMT+01:00 Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com
> <mailto:penorman at mac.com>>:
> 
>     On 12/29/2015 11:39 AM, Rafael Avila Coya wrote:
> 
>         Hi, list:
> 
>         The Uganda Bureau of Statistics has released health and educational
>         facilities data for use in OSM under the ODbL license [1].
> 
>         This import is about the educational set (24,000+ nodes), and it
>         would
>         be done manually through the HOT Tasking Manager, in a similar
>         way as
>         with the Central African Rep. UNICEF data import (2012) and
>         others that
>         followed.
> 
>         The import has been communicated to the Uganda OSM community, and is
>         being submitted here for final validation by the wider OSM
>         community.
> 
> 
>     Can you provide a link to the Ugandan discussion? It's also wrong to
>     refer to this as a final validation - it's discussion just like
>     needed to be done with the Ugandan community, and neither is more a
>     final validation than the other.
> 
>         You can find the import wiki here [2] and the more practical
>         workflow
>         wiki here [3]. Note that the workflow wiki is not finished, as
>         it needs
>         a few screenshots to be changed.
> 
> 
>     Looking at the suggested changeset comment, you should not mandate a
>     particular comment, but have users use a good changeset comment[1].
>     You've also listed the source tag twice.
> 
>     Past experience has shown that importing with a fixme doesn't work.
>     They don't generally get fixed.
> 
>     Are users expected to make use of the information in the note tag
>     and then remove it, so we won't see note tags in what is imported?
> 
>     The workflow mentions abbreviations. Are these common enough to be
>     worth expanding in the conversion script?
> 
>     Can we see some sample data?
> 
>     [1]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Imports mailing list
>     Imports at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
> 



More information about the Imports mailing list