[Imports] Uganda Bureau of Statistics educational facilities import

Enock Seth Nyamador kwadzo459 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 20:27:30 UTC 2016


I've been adding using "operator:type"

But there is one thing am still not sure of, is:

Private and Private Aided = private?
Government and Government Aided = government?

Best

- Enock
UMaT, Tarkwa
enockseth.github.io

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Enock Seth Nyamador <kwadzo459 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Raphael and Jotam.
>
> Am very careful not to assume any condition and act in my own opinion.
> Will be back here or refer to workflow if there is any problem. Thanks.
>
> Best,
>
> - Enock
> UMaT, Tarkwa
> enockseth.github.io
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Jotam <jotam at posteo.de> wrote:
>
>> Many schools in Uganda will follow exactly that name pattern: "VILLAGE
>> NAME Primary School".
>>
>> This is extremely common, especially in smaller places. So please don't
>> delete "Primary / Secondary School" from the name tag as it is most likely
>> an integral part of the name indeed.
>>
>> Am 24. Januar 2016 03:38:36 EAT, schrieb Rafael Avila Coya <
>> ravilacoya at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi, Enock:
>>>
>>> I have already imported hundreds of nodes, and found only one duplicate.
>>>
>>> In case of duplicates, it's quite clear: just merge them in one. If the
>>> names are similar, like in your example, I would put one of the names as
>>> alt_name.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rafael.
>>>
>>> On 23/01/16 22:54, Enock Seth Nyamador wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi Jo,
>>>>
>>>>  That sounds like a clue though but sometimes there could be more than
>>>>  one Primary/Secondary schools in same village/parish and other way -
>>>>  duplicates (as in my current task with 2 nodes each with same names).
>>>>  Adding the parish/village as an integral part of name could conflict
>>>>  with an existing feature name.
>>>>
>>>>  Best,
>>>>
>>>>  - Enock
>>>>  UMaT, Tarkwa
>>>>  enockseth.github.io <http://enockseth.github.io/>
>>>>
>>>>  On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com
>>>>  <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      Hi Enock,
>>>>
>>>>      Went to a Missing Maps event this afternoon and was a bit pressed
>>>>      for time when I answered. When you drop Primary/Secondary school
>>>>      from those names, all that's left is the name of the village/parish.
>>>>      That's not the name of the school either, so I'd say it's an
>>>>      integral part of the name after all.
>>>>
>>>>      Jo
>>>>
>>>>      2016-01-23 13:08 GMT+01:00 Enock Seth Nyamador <kwadzo459 at gmail.com
>>>>      <mailto:kwadzo459 at gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>          Hi,
>>>>
>>>>          Just a quick one.
>>>>
>>>>          Came across some schools with names; Primary School and
>>>>          Secondary School. This aren't names.
>>>>
>>>>          What is best to do, just delete those tags? I would
>>>> have removed
>>>>          them, If I was mapping personally. But as this an import,
>>>>          haven't seen anything related to it on the Wiki.
>>>>
>>>>          Best,
>>>>
>>>>          - Enock
>>>>          UMaT, Tarkwa
>>>>          enockseth.github.io <http://enockseth.github.io/>
>>>>
>>>>          On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Rafael Avila Coya
>>>>          <ravilacoya at gmail.com <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>              Hi, Jo:
>>>>
>>>>              Yes. It happens many times. As I said, it would be very nice
>>>>              to have a
>>>>              JOSM plugin that would address switching between a list of user
>>>>              accounts. My vision would be of a simple plugin that would
>>>>              allow to:
>>>>
>>>>              1) Create a list of user accounts, instead of having only
>>>>              place for one,
>>>>
>>>>            as it is with the JOSM standard Preferences.
>>>>
>>>>              2) Easy button in the tools bar to switch between user accounts.
>>>>
>>>>              3) A checkbox to decide if you want JOSM to warn you what's
>>>>              the user you
>>>>              are using when uploading the data to OSM. That means: you
>>>>              hit the upload
>>>>              button, and as a final step, JOSM tells you: you are
>>>>              uploading with
>>>>              Polyglot OSM user account. Accept? (and the typical "cancel"
>>>>              and "Ok"
>>>>              buttons).
>>>>
>>>>              You have contributed lots of comments and great ideas, so I
>>>>              am not going
>>>>              to pressure you with contributing more. Anyway, although
>>>>              it's a bit of a
>>>>              nuissance, you will get used after a while. Many of us have
>>>>              done this
>>>>              since about 3 years ago for lots of
>>>> manual imports! And, if
>>>>              you get a
>>>>              task with say 15 schools (I did yesterday one with 147!),
>>>>              the time you
>>>>              spend switching between user accounts is less than 1% of the
>>>>              total.
>>>>
>>>>              Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>              Rafael.
>>>>
>>>>              On 22/01/16 22:17, Jo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  I tried to use my import account. Failed to do it. The stuff that should
>>>>>  have been uploaded with it, went up with my normal account. The
>>>>>  subsequent non import stuff went up with my import account.
>>>>>
>>>>>  It's too much of a hassle and yes I would need to switch back and forth
>>>>>  between accounts constantly.
>>>>>
>>>>>  So, I'll limit myself to doing validation work, until this silly rule
>>>>>  gets finally lifted some day. I won't be holding my breath, no worries.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Polyglot
>>>>>
>>>>>  2016-01-07 16:44 GMT+01:00 Rafael Avila Coya <ravilacoya at gmail.com <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com>
>>>>>  <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com <mailto:ravilacoya at gmail.com>>>:
>>>>>
>>>>>      Hi, Enock:
>>>>>
>>>>>      Thank you for volunteering!
>>>>>
>>>>>      Yes, Geoffrey has given his opinions already, and he offered something
>>>>>      very key here: help from the local OSM community.
>>>>>
>>>>>      As I guess there are quite a number of active members in Kampala (for
>>>>>      example), it could be of unvaluable help for double checking on the
>>>>>      ground the facilities inside the city, as those are the mainly the only
>>>>>      ones hard to spot from imagery.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>      Rafael.
>>>>>
>>>>>      On 04/01/16 15:42, Enock Seth Nyamador wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Very long discussion
>>>>>> here. Glad I was able to follow. I've copied
>>>>>>  Ugandan OSMer Geoffrey of Mapping Day Uganda[1] guess you might be
>>>>>>  interested in this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Am interested in volunteering for this import.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  1. http://www.mappingday.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  - Enock
>>>>>>  UMaT, Tarkwa
>>>>>>  enockseth.github.io <http://enockseth.github.io>
>>>>>>
>>>>>              <http://enockseth.github.io>
>>>>
>>>>>      <http://enockseth.github.io/>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>              <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>>
>>>>
>>>>>  <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>              <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com <mailto:winfixit at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>      Doing what I did in these 2 edits:
>>>>>>      https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3925002632/history
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      would make the import a whole lot slower, as it would entail a lot
>>>>>>      more research (and fiddling with Wikidata), but it would also make
>>>>>>      the data even more useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      If it were me, I'd add Wikidata items for each of these schools. I
>>>>>>      can write a script that would make the process easier. I'm not sure
>>>>>>      about license issues though. If I drag a node over Bing imagery and
>>>>>>      upload it to Openstreetmap. Can I use those coordinates on Wikidata
>>>>>>      if I mention the source properly? Or are they already ODBL and
>>>>>>      therefore incompatible. That would be really annoying. It would mean
>>>>>>      I have to make sure to add the coordinates to Wikidata first, and
>>>>>>      only after doing that upload to Openstreetmap, but I want to mention
>>>>>>      the source on Wikidata, so I need a reference
>>>>>> url to the OSM object...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      I think, at least for the schools with WP articles, it makes sense
>>>>>>      to do this. For the others I think it makes sense as well, but it's
>>>>>>      a lot more work. They would all get identifiers that way, which may
>>>>>>      make later conflation easier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Jo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Imports mailing list
>>>>>>      Imports at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>              <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org
>>>>              <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>>
>>>>
>>>>>      <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org
>>>>>
>>>>              <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>              <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org
>>>>              <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>>>
>>>>
>>>>>      https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>              Imports mailing list
>>>>              Imports at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Imports at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>              https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Imports mailing list
>>> Imports at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Imports mailing list
>> Imports at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20160126/333174f8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Imports mailing list