[Imports] Calgary addresses
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 09:49:50 UTC 2016
2016-07-19 8:46 GMT+02:00 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:
> 1. Why are they explicitly limiting the data use to lawful purposes if
> this is so clear anyway?
Yes, the clause really seems silly, because if you'd pursue unlawful
purposes, wouldn't the last thing you'd care about, be the infringement of
a data license? Take a national secret service, apparently (nearly ;-) )
all of them are violating their own countries laws and constitutions (which
they should officially be protecting) and undermining the democratic
control set up to limit their power, etc.. Would they refrain from using
this or any other data they can get their hands on because of a clause like
this in a license that grants data use rights?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Imports