[Imports] Worldwide fuel stations import, down to 56k objects

Ilya Zverev ilya at zverev.info
Tue Mar 27 08:37:02 UTC 2018


First, it is not an improvement. For you, the mapper, it may be, because with the _current_ QA tools it is hard to review big changesets. But this essentially bans any big imports or QA.

Second, Pierre suggest a rule that cannot be enforced. I see big QA changesets every day, and what I don't see are a similar stream of reverts or discussions on any of the mailing lists. This new rule would essentially block "good" imports or QA, authors of which are ready to discuss their work. But it won't stop people who do these without any prior discussion. Which means, more and more people will try to "sneak" their changes under radar.

Ilya

> 27 марта 2018 г., в 11:09, Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl> написал(а):
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 March 2018 09:31:16 CEST, Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote:
> 
>> Disagree, I don't think that new rules for imports are good idea.
> 
> Because? It would be good to know your thinking. If the rules can be improved, why not? 
> 
> Colin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports




More information about the Imports mailing list