[Imports] Fwd: Importing West Virginia State Forests Boundary
Minh Nguyen
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
Thu Aug 12 19:27:26 UTC 2021
Vào lúc 07:52 2021-08-12, Adam Franco đã viết:
> > On 12 Aug 2021, at 08:38, Mateusz Konieczny via Imports
> <imports at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:imports at openstreetmap.org>>
> wrote:
> I disagree. For simple polygons (few nodes), overlapping ways might
> be the easiest to maintain representation, but as an editor I would
> always prefer a multipolygon to tens or hundreds of
> reused/overlapping nodes in overlapping ways.
>
> As a heavy land-cover mapper I agree that multipolygons are vastly
> easier to improve over time than to try to disconnect overlapping ways.
>
> That said, unless I'm misreading the wiki the import being discussed
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/West_Virginia_State_Forests_Import>
> is about State Forest (protected area) boundaries not
> land-cover/land-use. I'd rather not have folks doing land-cover/land-use
> imports from poor data, but I'm of the opinion that protected area
> boundaries are often a very good candidate for [careful] importing if
> the data are of good quality.
I agree, this seems like a pretty reasonable thing to import. Also, we
aren't talking about a lot of features that would be difficult to clean
up if things go awry.
The next time someone proposes a building import, I'll be bracing myself
for a debate about the lack of associatedStreet relations in an
unrelated address import. 🙈
--
minh at nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
More information about the Imports
mailing list