[Imports] [Talk-us-newyork] [Imports-us] Update: New York State GIS SAM Address Points Import

[Kevin Kenny]

Sounds good.

As I said, I'll have a look - much as I did with tiger:reviewed in the
county. (Do the Overpass query on that and you'll see where I've got to.)

I'll be slow, since a lot of the discrepancies need field checks. (And
being an Upstater yourself, you'll know that this is not the season for
extensive field work.)

I'll likely be writing to you more about edge cases.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 11:17 Skyler Hawthorne <osm at dead10ck.com> wrote:

> Hi Kenny, thanks for taking a look!
>
> There is currently nothing super coordinated. I tried setting up a project
> in the Tasking Manager, but it doesn't let you make a project larger than
> 5000 km², so it doesn't appear that it would work well for the review
> effort. I did a closer manual inspection while I was doing Rensselaer
> county, and from the standpoint of "whether this data is usable",
> everything seemed fine. So in an effort to strike the best balance between
> actually getting the data in OSM and usable and getting the data perfectly
> in sync with existing OSM data, my plan is to do a bulk import of all the
> data first, and then go through all the addresses that were marked for
> review. This approach will also allow others who wish to help with review
> do so at their leisure. Based on what I've seen, the worst downside is that
> there are duplicate addresses in the map, which isn't the end of the world.
>
> Once everything is imported, my plan was to basically do Overpass queries
> for all the things with the "nysgissam:review" tag and address them. So
> far, the vast majority of the things marked for review are small
> discrepancies in the street name in OSM vs the address DB, followed by
> conflicts with existing house numbers, city names, etc.
>
> The current tally of things marked for review is: 72424
>
> --
> Skyler
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 11:04, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> I'll get going on reviewing Schenectady County. Thanks!
>
> Refresh my memory: is there a system coordinating the review effort?
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20210209/eabe3ead/attachment-0001.htm>