[Imports] Zapis trees in Serbia

[Komadinovic Vanja]

Thank you all for valuable feedback, I really appreciate it.

I will add source tag to changesets in the future, somehow I missed
that. Also, will use ref:zapis instead of ref for assigned ids by team
since some trees are marked by the government also.

Regarding zapis=yes, I understand the concern about adding a new tag
for such a narrow topic. Using sacred makes sense. I'm concerned that
sacred=yes is too generic on the other hand and I would like to keep
the notion that a particular tree is zapis. If nobody objects I would
use sacred=zapis. I would research the topic a bit more and then
create a wiki page describing usage as suggested.

Best,
Vanja

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 1:33 PM Arne Kimmig via Imports
<imports at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Using religion and denomination for deeper specification as defined in wiki.osm sounds good to me.
>
> Examples:
>
> For Zapis trees it could be
>
> natural=tree
> sacred=yes
> religion=christian
> denomination=serbian_orthodox
>
> For an animistic spring
>
> natural=spring
> sacred=yes
> religion=animistic
>
> For a sacred location without deeper knowledge of the cult or religion
>
> place=locality
> sacred=yes
>
> Anyway I think this thread should be further discussed in the tagging list be it for zapis=yes or sacred=yes.
>
> Best,
> Arne
>
>
>
>
>
>
> denomination=serbian_orthodox
>
> Am 12.02.2021 um 12:38 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>:
>
> what about adding a religion=* (potentially to sacred=yes)? When speaking about sanctity it is important which religion (and maybe denomination) this is about
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports