[Imports] Yet another global building footprints import attempt

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Jul 22, 2022, 11:43 by marc_marc at mailo.com:

> Le 22.07.22 à 10:35, Mateusz Konieczny via Imports a écrit :
>
>> How you will avoid importing buildings demolished in 2014 and deleted since?
>>
>
> it's the same issue with manual tracing no ?
>
Not in areas with more recent imagery.

>
> imho this is one of the reasons to use life cycle tags : if I delete
> in osm a building destroyed yesterday and still present on all the imagery, it risks to be added again (because nowadays, the majority
> of the buildings are traced from the imagery and not by going to make gps surveys all around each building
> let's use was:building or destroyed:building or something similar + end_date for the few years it takes to update sat imaging
>
it makes sense to keep them until locally preferable imagery is up to date

It does not make sense to keep them forever just because someone has 
dataset of machine-generated buildings from 2014 Bing imagery.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20220722/e6214358/attachment.htm>