[Imports] Florida Landuse Import

[Mateusz Konieczny]

3300: Mixed Upland Nonforested ||''natural=wood''

this would at least benefit from comment there

| 2500: Specialty Farms || landuse=farmyard
is it likely that some will be partially landuse=farmland?

| 5500: Major Springs || ''natural=water''
no spring tagging?

| 6530: Intermittent Ponds || ''natural=water;water=pond''
what about intermittent=yes ?

|7430: Spoil Areas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dspoil_heap ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill ?

"we didn't landcover these when manually mapping Bibb County Alabama"
is not really clear, but that is a tiny documentation issue

> JOSM validator tool can't figure out that the water areas it thinks it is
> another water area is actually not in the overlaying water area due to
> an inner part of the relation cutting out the section the flagged water body is in

You can report bugs via "Help -> Report bug"


Mar 7, 2022, 04:11 by kendallmullenhour at gmail.com:

> Hello all again,
>
> The Florida Landuse Import wiki page > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Florida_Landuse_Import>  has been updated again, adding a bunch of FDEP codes that were missing when I ran the processing through Taylor County, Florida. The original import was indeed buggy, I do not know how he was able to import all of that without thousands of error messages popping up on the JOSM validator; after I finishing replacing all the shapefile tagging jargon with only OSM tagging as per the tag conversion table on the wiki page, the JOSM validator flagged over 700+ warnings/errors in that county alone, and I was able to correct all of those errors (most of the errors were overlap errors due to an intermediate node missing on one of the two ways). The last iteration of the validator only flagged 7 warnings for the whole county after I finished fixing em all, (water area inside water area warning because JOSM validator can't figure out that the larger water area relation does not apply to the smaller one cause an inner way cuts out the larger area from the area the flagged water body is in). Taylor County's final processed data is also now available for download through the link at the bottom of this project's wiki page, thus beginning the official discussion and commentary period lasting a minimum of two weeks before the test section is uploaded live. Note the file is about 122 MB so it might take a while to download for those with slower Internet connections. All feedback is appreciated and will be incorporated into this import project.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kendall Mullenhour (username RollTideRoll_asdfjkll at > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RollTideRoll_asdfjkll> )
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20220307/4efe5b4b/attachment.htm>