[Imports] Redmond WA Address Import proposal
Matthew Whilden
matthew.whilden at gmail.com
Thu Nov 24 02:02:51 UTC 2022
Tracking back a bit further, there's this thread from the local user group
getting permission to use the data in 2012. (
https://groups.google.com/g/osm-seattle/c/XhQwyBlkqeI?hl=en) Should I
understand that this permission should be considered expired? Not covering
the data I wish to use? Some other thing?
Seeking some clarity so that, presuming new communication needs to happen,
that it's granted in a more durable way. I will try to follow up with the
other folks from this rather old thread.
Matt
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 7:40 AM Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:
>
> Matthew Whilden <matthew.whilden at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > Thanks for taking the time. I totally agree that the license is ...
> > interesting. My interest in the dataset arose because it is regularly
> > mentioned by local mapping folks as a good source we can pull from. This
> > seems to be largely because of written permission received several years
> > ago and mentioned in under King County Washington here:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#United_States
> >
> > I am not a license person so will happily call the license posted as not
> > compatible with ODbL etc. But then the question becomes... Does the
> earlier
> > permission we've logged control the issue? My, maybe naive, impression
> was
> > yes.
> >
> > Sorry if any of this is covered elsewhere. I've tried to do my homework
> but
> > there's a lot to chew off all at once.
>
> Don't worry -- this is all very difficult.
>
> That permission appears to say that having the attribution on the
> Contributors page sufficees for their attribution requirement. That's
> great, but it doesn't talk about the rest of the terms. I am guessing
> that they have changed their terms from essentially cc-by to
> lots-of-stuff-including-indemnification between 2012 and 2022.
>
> I would suggest that you figure out if anyone local has a relationship
> with the county, and have that person talk to them about their license.
> That's a tricky conversation, so it should be someone who is good at
> difficult conversations!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20221123/37ce2257/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Imports
mailing list