[Imports] UPLOADING U-WIMP project data to osm

[open@enockseth.co]

Hi,Also, for the sake of the length of this thread, I will not be engaging further but will make sure that we all do receive an adaptable and workable dataset into osm.  You seem to already have decided what you wanted to do, ignoring best practices. You kept skipping very important questions.
These kinds of OSM contributions create problems for volunteer contributors.
Believing in a community does not mean that the community should say yes even if it's a no.
Also, guiding you does not mean doing your job for you; that's up to whoever. Don't see it as support you are paying for.
All the best,
Enock
 On 25.11.22 05:52, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:Still a lot of bad tags there. Why do people bother with starting a thread here at all if they do not plan to consider the feedbacks? We should really make an effort to prevent imports from introducing poorly defined and undocumented tags. The community will later consider these "in use" and that might harm OSM. Cheers, On Fri, 25 Nov 2022, 02:36 Mike Thompson, <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:It looks the data was imported without resolving the issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129246985 Mike On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:50 AM Stellamaris Nakacwa <sn00013 at mix.wvu.edu> wrote:Dear Frederik,  Thank you so much! I would like to highlight that my standpoint is not against the valuable feedback that the team has had to offer, with utmost sincerity, I appreciate that and its importance is well underscored! My standpoint is against the hegemonic subtext or rather condescending undertone that was exhibited by that person daring their support. That is not an okay thing because this is not what I believe this community is about and it takes us from the overall agenda of having contribution but instead a win or a loss discourse. Perhaps, a guiding template on email messaging to necessary changes can be devised to help alleviate such!  Also, for the sake of the length of this thread, I will not be engaging further but will make sure that we all do receive an adaptable and workable dataset into osm.   Thank you! Stellamaris  On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:50 AM Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:Hi,

let me say this very bluntly: The community consultation process of an
import cannot be resolved by the would-be importer "intimately taking a
stand" on something or "begging to differ". If you cannot find broad
support in the community for proceeding with the import, and you proceed
anyway, then your import will be promptly removed from OSM.

Best
Frederik

--
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports  _______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
Imports at openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
-- 
Best,
-Enock
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20221125/e8463d63/attachment.htm>