[Imports] HIFLD

[James Crawford]

On 10/3/2022 1:10 PM, Marc_marc wrote:

> in to what has already been said, a word of terminology: if you review 
> each object and it makes sense for that type of object to "review it 
> from a distance", then it is not an import.
How should I refer to it?
> but as much as i want to believe that you look at the existence of 100 
> trees on the sat imagery, it seems hard to believe that this is what 
> is actually done when there are 999. and especially there is not much 
> in the opendata that is seen on the sat imagery
>
> so instead of making a theoretical import plan covering all possible 
> cases, take an example of a data set and talk about reality instead of 
> theoretical hypothesis
I added a tightly reviewed set of the Cell towers database in Alabama 
awhile back. you can see the results on the OSM server: 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mti


-James Crawford (SherbetS)