[Imports] Proposed Import - Cache Valley, UT Address Points

[jacob at cyptem.com]

Greg, regarding temporary duplication - Is your concern that the project 
will be abandoned midway through, leaving unreviewed data? Not sure why 
I didn't think of this earlier, but deduplication could conceivably be 
done by hand in JOSM before the upload occurs.

I agree that in this scenario, maximizing automation (combining address 
points with buildings, deduplication, etc) has its benefits. My only 
objections to that are the developer time and the increased potential 
for issues to slip through the cracks unnoticed. I'll do some deeper 
searching into the past imports list and see if I can find an existing 
solution.

Jacob

On 2022-10-05 20:14, Greg Troxel wrote:

> Conflation: This will be an issue since a small portion of buildings
> in Cache Valley already have address information. However, since
> addresses should be manually combined with building outlines anyway,
> temporarily having a few duplicates is OK.
> 
> I don't think it's ok.  I think someone should figure out how to do 
> this
> programmatically, and that all the people doing address imports might
> collaborate, or steal code from previous address imports.
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> Imports at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/attachments/20221006/ce11f53a/attachment.htm>