[josm-dev] Refactoring of the JOSM architecture vs. Plugins

[Shaun McDonald]

Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, J.H. wrote:
>
> [..]
>   
>> - Identify plugins which might just as well be moved into the JOSM code
>> base (I'm sure there's plenty of code which doesn't have to be a plugin).
>>     
>
> Unglue is the only candidate ATM.
>   
Add the AgPhoto plugin, as it is way more memory efficient than the 
builtin photo linking.

Shaun