[josm-dev] Refactoring of the JOSM architecture vs. Plugins

jh jh at foobar.de
Tue Aug 19 09:54:43 BST 2008


Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> The reason I don't work with JOSM-NG myself, and the reason I came to 
> JOSM in the first place, is that I am result oriented. 
I guess this happens to be the reason for everybody else (excluding 
Petr) as well.
> I don't care for 
> Java. I want the editor to be usable to the mappers, and I want to 
> concentrate the little time I have on working on new *features* that 
> make life easier for mappers, instead of a cleaner architecture (even if 
> this possibly helps new features in the future - the whole of OSM is a 
> "low hanging fruit" project, we don't usually do things that will help 
> us the day after tomorrow, we do things that help us now).
>   
Yes. Making life easier was the motivation for me to work on the 
performance. For frequently used cases like moving a node this way 
highly successful. I know the patch currently sits with Dirk as there 
are cases when it produces repaint artifacts, but than can be fixed. The 
want for a cleaner architecture was driven by this very piece of work.

Joerg




More information about the josm-dev mailing list