[josm-dev] Commit message not empty

[Matt Amos]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> wrote:
> Well, in reality Potlatch can put any comment where the hell it likes
> because it's not hidebound by the XML API that you poor saps have to labour
> under...

and, in reality, so can JOSM. the XML api doesn't require a comment
tag on the changeset at any point.

of course, if what you meant was that because you write the potlatch
api you can reach into the guts of the database and fiddle with
changesets after they're closed... well... :-P

cheers,

matt