[josm-dev] JOSM-NG and eclipse rcp

Ľubomír Varga luvar at plaintext.sk
Sun Apr 26 11:24:54 BST 2009


I am here new, but my opinion is this:

Eclipse and NetBeans are wery good programs. I use both equaly, about 2 hours 
a day (minimaly...) Developing program use relativly few resources (text 
editor :D). look at memmory and cpu compsintion of this monsters. Now add to 
it some gis sw consumption of resources. Should I buy new PC for josm-ng?

What about to use http://geotools.codehaus.org/ framework and make josm-ng on 
it? It is bigger framework (more of code for josm-ng writen if compared to 
eclipse/netbeans) and it should be faster to develop gis application there.

Just my opinion.

ps: I have 1.5 gb ram and runnig eclipse and netbeans at one time with default 
system (linux, ff, boinc, kontact....) utilizes it at about 90% :-)


On Sunday 26 April 2009 10:48:19 Adrian Stabiszewski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > i wonder if anyone considered (and evaluated) the usage of the eclipse
> > rcp framework for a josm-ng implementation. If yes, do you see any
> > problems with using the eclipse rcp?
>
> This idea is on my mind for several months now. I my opinion moving the
> josm functionality to an Eclipse RCP basead feature would create a new eco
> system for OSM applications. My idea is more of an OSM workbench which not
> only integrates an editor but also adds other functionality like quality
> assurance (osm bugs, relation analyzers, ...) and navigation applications.
> Everything designed and implemented as a plugin/feature using the update
> site functionality of the Eclipse framework.
>
> I don't have everything figured out yet, since there are several issues
> when trying to design such a workbench. But I think that if some developers
> here would be interested to discuss such a workbench we could easily find
> the correct solutions.
> In my opinion many developers hesitate right now to contribute to josm due
> to its code architecture. This topic has been discussed here several times
> so I'll leave it with that statement.
> Moving to a new framework and redesigning the functionality into plugins
> would give everybody a new start and push the development.
>
> It would be interesting to hear what the josm developers think about it.
>
>
> Regards,
> Adrian.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> josm-dev mailing list
> josm-dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

-- 
Odborník na všetko je zlý odborník. Ja sa snažím byť výnimkou potvrdzujúcou 
pravidlo.




More information about the josm-dev mailing list