[josm-dev] how does the transition to tested work ?

[Karl Guggisberg]

>  I attempted to fix this once, but gave up soon. All these listeners
>  firing back and forth - it was frustrating to debug. Maybe you could
>  have a look, Karl? :)
Yeah, I will, I think I was very fascinated by PropertyChangeListeners
when I hacked this ;-)

-- Karl

Am 08.03.2010 17:21, schrieb Sebastian Klein:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>    
>>> #4584 (cursor not show in textfields of relations-editor) Cannot
>>> reproduce. We don't have enough info to fix this.
>>>        
>> I think this is the same issue as I've just described in this bug
>> report: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4686
>>      
> If it actually is the same issue, then it might be possible to fix it.
>
> (This "broken" state seems to be the default behavior of a Java table.)
>
>    
>>> #4631 (Plugin download broken) [3090] should have addressed most
>>> points of this ticket.
>>>
>>> #4401 (JOSM does not remember what has been uploaded) It's more
>>> like an enhancement. Too complicated, will be fixed after release.
>>>        
>> I've used JOSM a lot recently to upload objects in the "one object at
>>   a time" mode, if it fails with a conflict it will start the whole
>> thing over again (even if it doesn't need to).
>>      
> This is news to me. Just tried the little "test script" from Karl in
> "one object at a time" mode and it worked well. (I.e. it created a
> conflict and the objects that had been uploaded before, where not marked
> as "modified" anymore.
>
> I would appreciate, if you could describe a way to reproduce.
>
>    
>>> #4371 (Changeset comment reverts to previous when switching
>>> options) The blocker flag wasn't set by a developer. Should be
>>> fixed, but isn't all that serious.
>>>        
>> FWIW I have at least 10 large changesets uploaded to the main API
>> that have inaccurate changeset summaries because of this and related
>> bugs.
>>      
> I attempted to fix this once, but gave up soon. All these listeners
> firing back and forth - it was frustrating to debug. Maybe you could
> have a look, Karl? :)
>
> __
>
> Sebastian
>
> _______________________________________________
> josm-dev mailing list
> josm-dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
>