[josm-dev] GPX upload?
Axel Kollmorgen
akollmorgen at gmail.com
Sun Nov 7 19:12:07 GMT 2010
On 2010-11-07 06:57, Sebastian Klein wrote:
> you are right, DirectUpload plugin could benefit a lot from the code
> in OsmApi. Actually I have the feeling it might be easier to add the
> gpx upload code directly to the OsmApi class. (Or is there an easy
> way to hook in?)
if it had been easy, i would have done it :) i don't think it should go
directly into the OsmApi class, but into a specialized class.
suggestions are welcome.
> If you like, you can fully integrate the plugin into JOSM core, this
> is planned anyway.
i'll see what i can do.
> At the moment, the plugin doesn't seem to use the server url from
> the preferences. That's why i couldn't test with the development
> server (http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/api). But this shouldn't
> be a problem, when OsmApi is used, right?
no, it shouldn't be a problem then. if the api works. when i tested,
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/oauth/... gave me constant 401
"Invalid OAuth Request" errors, so i had to test with the default url,
anyway.
>> * the enabled state of the "upload traces" menu entry depends on the
>> layer selection in `LayerListDialog`. but while `LayerListDialog` does
>> handle list selection events, and while you can hook into "added,
>> removed, and renamed layers" via `addLayerChangeListener()` [1], there
>> is no way for "outsiders" to add a listener to layer *selection*
>> change events. i know of at least one plugin that would need this
>> functionality as well [2], so it seems to be a reasonable thing to add.
>
> It should be enabled, whenever a gpx layer is present. So i don't
> understand why you removed that code. Then, a selection combobox like
> for photo synchronization would be nice. (Or a list of all gpx layers
> with checkboxes in front?) Of course, the selected layer should be the
> default entry. In addition, i'd suggest an 'upload gpx' entry in the
> right click menu of the gpx layer.
it should be enabled when a gpx layer is selected (that's part of
>> changed the way the gpx layer to be uploaded is selected among all
>> open layers
). as i say above, this information is not accessible by plugins. what
happens now is that if no gpx layer is selected, the "upload trace"
dialog pops up, but says "no gpx layer selected" and doesnt let ypu
upload anything.
i just got an idea for how to clevery solve this: remove the "upload
traces" toolbar button and put it into the context menu of the gpx
layer. no is_enabled check needed anymore: if there is no layer, there
is no context menu. also no check to see which layer has to be uploaded.
it also seems more intuitive to me. what do you think?
>> * also, while doing the history comboboxes, i found many code snippets
>> like this:
>>
>> List<String> descHistory = new LinkedList<String>(...);
>> // we have to reverse the history, because ComboBoxHistory
>> // will reverse it again in addElement()
>> Collections.reverse(descHistory);
>>
>> if we do it like that all over the place, wouldn't it make sense to do
>> the reversion in ComboBoxHistory?
>
> Yes, could be done. But it's used in some plugins, so it's annoying to
> change all occurrences and for very little benefit. (You are welcome to
> do it, though. :) )
removing duplicate code always seems beneficial to me :)
ax
More information about the josm-dev
mailing list