[josm-dev] validator question, multipolygons

[Russ Nelson]

Mike N writes:
 > On 3/5/2011 12:05 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
 > > I agree. What might work for better nannying is to only run the
 > > validator on things they've changed. Otherwise they get asked to fix
 > > everything within the bounding box they downloaded.
 > 
 >   ? It already works this way for me.

Hrm. Maybe you're right. I usually have the validator turned off, and
when I turn it on, dial it way back.

 > > Even better than that would be to do validation continuously. Much
 > > better to catch an error right away.
 > 
 >    That gets back to excessive chatter because there's no way to know 
 > the difference between a work in progress that involves several elements 
 > VS a complete edit and moving on.

It must be done non-intrusively. They would just appear in the
Validation window, and be outlined if the validation layer is visible.

-- 
--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog