Tracer2 Plugin / Alternative / WFS?

[Marián Kyral]

Forget to cc josm-dev at openstreetmap.org :-(



---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: Marián Kyral <mkyral at email.cz>
Komu: Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de>
Datum: 14. 12. 2020 8:41:58
Předmět: Re: Tracer2 Plugin / Alternative / WFS? 
"
Hi Florian,



---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: Florian Lohoff <f at zz.de>
Komu: josm-dev at openstreetmap.org
Datum: 13. 12. 2020 20:43:18
Předmět: Tracer2 Plugin / Alternative / WFS? 
" 
Hi, 
as the ALKIS Data for example for Northrhine-Westfalia have been 
republished as CC0 it is possible to use the Tracer2 Plugin and External 
Helper which have bitrottet a bit over the last years and are prone 
to backtraces/crashes and other problems. 

As Northrhine-Westfalia has also published the Building Outlines as 
a shape it would also be possible to use the outlines from the shape. 

While thinking about it it would a pretty plugin for be able to click 
somewhere and get a feature from a WFS Service which surrounds 
the clicked point. 

There is no point in trying an import as 90% of the buildings are 
there already. I'd rather like to see a simpler point-and-click 
feature by feature update/import. 

Is there some kind of WFS based Plugin? "



In Czechia we have developed a new version of original Tracer plugin. It is 
modular and the LPIS module is using WFS. The plan was to replace the 
original Tracer plugin, but it did not happened yet. It is developed 
separately in my github repository and the plugin is called tracer-testing 
in JOSM.




https://github.com/mkyral/josm-tracer/blob/development/src/org/
openstreetmap/josm/plugins/tracer/modules/lpis/LpisServer.java




Please check it, fell free to test and create a new module. Maybe it is a 
time to move forward and replace the original Tracer plugin. I have made 
"Classic" module, that should work in the same way as original module, but 
it is not tested a much as it needs mono server on localhost.





Regards,

Marián



"

Flo 
-- 
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de 
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away 
""