[OSM-legal-talk] legal-talk Digest, Vol 8, Issue 2
Robert (Jamie) Munro
rjmunro at arjam.net
Tue Apr 3 18:49:57 BST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matt Lee wrote:
> Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
>
>> Like codecs in what way? I.e. what about codecs means it's OK not to
>> "copyleft" them?
>
> Oh, I think it's okay to copyleft them, but I think if things
> like Ogg Vorbis are to achieve any level of saturation on the
> marketplace, where they will be useful on things like iPods and
> the like, then a license like the BSD (which is what they went
> for) is more useful. I don't think Microsoft is going to fork it.
Do you think OSM will achieve a level of saturation on the marketplace,
where it is useful on things like iPods, TomToms and the like if it is
copylefted?
Robert (Jamie) Munro
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGEpPDz+aYVHdncI0RAnEeAKCErp2UifugNBd8Msv2vpvPSedU8QCbBLAW
wAh6wanH0LgWPCMpqLmFoGU=
=3OOa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list