[OSM-legal-talk] INANAL - But these guys are

[Richard Fairhurst]

Nick Black wrote:

> So with a bit of arm bending, we've managed to get some CC guys to
> take a look at OSM's license situation.  What we need is a one or two
> page document that summarises OSM's current license, points out the
> problems with it and summarises some questions that we have about
> licensing.

Can you elucidate a bit as to the type of question they can answer?

I'm guessing that it's useful to ask CC lawyers questions about  
interpretation/meaning of a CC licence. I guess it's not useful to ask  
them big-picture questions like "should we just go PD instead?".

cheers
Richard