[OSM-legal-talk] Rules for the foundation to hold data assigned to it under
80n80n at gmail.com
Sat Jul 21 00:32:40 BST 2007
On 7/20/07, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> >> PD data will always be free
> > It's trivial to convert PD data to restrictively-licensed data.
> That doesn't make the original PD data any less free.
> > How many people make their own geodata public domain just so they can
> > contribute it to the TIGER dataset?
> Can one contribute to TIGER? I always thought this was a
> government-published thing and contributions were about as welcome as my
> own essays for the CIA world fact book.
> > How many just take the TIGER dataset, make a few mods, and sell it with
> > restrictive license?
> As far as I am aware, many companies are doing just that (creating
> something restricted, derived from TIGER, and sell it), while at the
> same time TIGER data is a valuable basis for free software (e.g.
> So what point are you trying to make? Has someone sued roadnav.sf.net
> for using TIGER data, or what?
The point is that TIGER does not have a community caring for it. OSM *is* a
community that cares for its data.
If all OSM data is placed in the public domain then there is a risk that the
community will fade away. The OSM dataset could become just like the TIGER
We need to be very careful not to do something that would destroy the
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33'
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the legal-talk