[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Progressing OSM to a new dataLicence regime
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Feb 7 09:22:22 GMT 2008
Hi,
> There are negative sides to a copyright assignment. A) We probably
> wouldn't get one from e.g. AND or MASSGIS (although I'm speculating). B)
> It would mean the scenario I mentioned to Frederik, where a commercial
> company could sue a license violator, couldn't happen, because they
> would no longer be the copyright holder.
C) the foundation would become hugely more important, and with that the
decision-making processes inside the Foundation and so on would suddenly
be under much more scrutiny than they are now, and we'd be spending 90%
of our time squabbling over how a certain vote might have ended
differently if only this and that. Not good. I like the Foundation to be
as unimportant as possible.
Bye
Frederik
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list