[OSM-legal-talk] Including OSM maps in leaflets

[tinkerbell.REMOVE.SPAM at gsmpaaiml.com]

Hello Frederik,

On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:38:57 +0100, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>  
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>> > Sounds ok apart from the fact that we're CC-BY-SA 2.0, not 3.0.

Full ACK.

>> [...]
>
> True but anything created/printed/... *now* will forever be CC-BY-SA
> 2.0 and not some kind of new license.

IANAL, but no.
_Now_, the content map data is under CC-BY-SA 2.0.
But his does not mean that he can't get the content _now_ under CC-BY-SA  
3.0. As stated in [1,§4.b] one may distribute a "Derivative Work" (which I  
guess is the case here) under "a later version of this License with the  
same License Elements".
Therefore, I argue that CC-BY-SA 3.0 should be okay, given we're talking  
about a "Derivative Work".

Kind regards,
Tinker

[1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode